Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (Kenya)
Select Evaluation Unit Independent Evaluation Service (IES) Regional Office for Arab States (Egypt) Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand) Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (Kenya) Regional Office for West and Central Africa (Senegal) Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia (Turkey) Regional Office for Americas and the Caribbean (Panama) Multi Country Office for Southern Africa (South Africa) Multi-Country Office for the Maghreb (Morocco) Multi-Country Office for India, Bhutan, Maldives, and Sri Lanka Multi-Country Office for the Pacific (Fiji) Kazakhstan Multi-Country Office for the Caribbean (Barbados) Burundi Cameroon Cote d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Ethiopia Kenya Liberia Malawi Mali Mozambique Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Uganda Zimbabwe Egypt Iraq Jordan Palestine Afghanistan Bangladesh Cambodia Nepal Pakistan Papua New Guinea Thailand Timor Leste Vietnam Albania Bosnia Herzegovina Georgia Kyrgyzstan Moldova Tajikistan Brazil Bolivia Colombia Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Haiti Mexico Paraguay UNTF to EVAW Fund for Gender Equality Strategic Partnerships Division Management and Administration Division Algeria Libya Mauritania Tunisia Yemen Somalia Niger China Indonesia Kiribati Lao People's Democratic Republic Philippines Samoa Solomon Islands Vanuatu Kosovo Serbia Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Argentina Honduras Peru Nicaragua Uruguay Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Bahamas Belize Dominica Grenada Guyana Jamaica St. Kitts-Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Anguilla Bermuda British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Montserrat Turks & Caicos Islands Bonaire Curacao St. Maarten Aruba Myanmar Policy, Programme and Intergovernmental Division UN System Coordination Division Turkmenistan Ukraine Uzbekistan IST Human Resources Division Executive Director's Office UNIFEM DATA 2008-2011 Chile Turkey Lebanon Central African Republic Civil Society Division Strategy, Planning, Resources and Effectiveness Division African Union Liaison Office - Ethiopia
Overall the evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations are considered very useful and will inform the forthcoming Regional Office (RO) Strategic Note 2018-21 in terms of how to more effectively support the design, implementation and follow-up of Capacity Development (CD) initiatives both internally and at the level of ESA region. Partners involved in the Evaluation Reference Group (ERG) have also expressed their appreciation for the insight and learning gained from this evaluation. The RO wishes to raise a concern regarding the selection of case studies in 2016 for this evaluation. It is acknowledged that there was an extensive consultation process with Senior Management based on the principle of inclusiveness which aimed at identifying 1 case study from each thematic area. The selection criteria outlined in the evaluation TOR were the following: CD initiatives that were considered most relevant and with significant human and financial investment; Initiatives with strong learning potential; Initiatives that were well documented; and Initiatives that were on-going or closed. However, the selected 2014 and 2015 Sharefair initiatives were not designed under a CD perspective. The evaluation conclusions and recommendations should therefore not necessarily be applied to them. Another important qualification as highlighted in the evaluation report is related to the fact that the 6 selected initiatives are very diverse in terms of maturity, vision and scope. While the evaluation looked at the 6 different initiatives at the same time it was not possible to undertake a stand-alone evaluation of each initiative. It is therefore challenging for the evaluation to make detailed recommendations for each initiative, or recommendations that equally apply for the 6 initiatives altogether. The added value of the evaluation must be seen in the analytical framework and Theory of Change for the design, implementation and follow-up of CD initiatives overall while taking into account the different characteristics of the selected case studies. This is considered most useful for moving forward and the management response to the evaluation recommendations below is based on this forward-looking perspective. Given the different recommendations in the evaluation are interlinked the management response takes a comprehensive approach in addressing the recommendations.
*Comments