Papua New Guinea
Select Evaluation Unit Afghanistan African Union Liaison Office - Ethiopia Albania Algeria Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Aruba Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belize Bermuda Bolivia Bonaire Bosnia Herzegovina Brazil British Virgin Islands Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chile China Civil Society Division Colombia Cote d'Ivoire Curacao Democratic Republic of Congo Dominica Dominican Republic Dummy Unit Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Ethiopia Executive Director's Office Fund for Gender Equality Georgia Ghana Grenada Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Human Resources Division Independent Evaluation Service (IES) Indonesia Intergovernmental Support Office Iraq IST Jamaica Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Liberia Libya Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Malawi Mali Management and Administration Division Mauritania Mexico Moldova Montserrat Mozambique Multi Country Office for Southern Africa (South Africa) Multi-Country Office for India, Bhutan, Maldives, and Sri Lanka Multi-Country Office for the Caribbean (Barbados) Multi-Country Office for the Maghreb (Morocco) Multi-Country Office for the Pacific (Fiji) Myanmar Nepal Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Pakistan Palestine Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Policy and Programme Bureau Policy, Programme and Intergovernmental Division Programme Division Regional Office for Americas and the Caribbean (Panama) Regional Office for Arab States (Egypt) Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand) Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (Kenya) Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia (Turkey) Regional Office for West and Central Africa (Senegal) Rwanda Samoa Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Slovakia Solomon Islands Somalia South Sudan St. Kitts-Nevis St. Lucia St. Maarten St. Vincent & the Grenadines Strategic Partnership, Civil Society, Communications and Resource Mobilization Division Strategic Partnerships Division Strategy, Planning, Resources and Effectiveness Division Sudan Suriname Tajikistan Tanzania Test Unit Thailand Timor Leste Trinidad & Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks & Caicos Islands Uganda Ukraine UN System Coordination Division UNIFEM DATA 2008-2011 UNTF to EVAW Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vietnam Yemen Zimbabwe
With regards to lessons learned from the evaluation exercise that are directly related to the project, there were number noted. They included; 1) The required timeframe to conduct end of the project evaluation. For this case, evaluation was conducted a month after the project closure. At least two months from the project closure should have been given prior to commencement of the project evaluation. 2) In the case of project implementation, it takes time for the project implementation to kick start and the 18 months time frame is not realistic. At least some three months is taken up by project Initiation with key stakeholders while actual Implementation may start four (4) months after project funds are released. 3) The effective and regular monitoring by PBSO during project implementation could have addressed a lot of challenges identified in the evaluation. This includes inadequate data to provide background information, informed decisions making processes and address challenges immediately as they arise, reporting requirements etc. 4) Engagement of key stakeholders throughout the project cycle is important for effective partnership; support towards implementation and project ownership. In the case of the PBF projects, partners/key stakeholders were involved when project implementation was initiated. This caused some challenges to get buy-in from the stakeholders.
*Comments