:
The evaluation was a very interesting and positive experience organized at a difficult time, given COVID-19 and the inability to convene the CO team for reflections, nor for the ET to conduct interviews with stakeholders face to face, the ET did very well. Whilst I would suggest that from an external perspective the evaluation is reasonable, however from an awareness of the complexity of the country and situation in intimate detail, it is quite hard on the team who are stretched very thin, conventional staffing does not match the time subsumed tackling the complexity and volume of relationships that have to be maintained. Indeed many issues raised by the evaluation have been initiated or addressed to some extent, but further depth is needed, the office would be more advanced or have taken a more sophisticated approach in a less complex environ.
Lessons learned, conclusions are well taken, indeed the office recognizes and has been working on most of them for some time, with significant steps forward in many areas. Conclusions are similarly relevant and noted, again significant steps forward in most of these areas have been taken especially in recent years. Perhaps it is valuable to recognise the significant change with office development since 2015, over the years we have seen significant steps forward in the two more mature areas of work note-ably Eliminating Violence Against Women (EVAW) and GRB, this has resulted in more normative engagement and policy development in these areas, and significantly more thematic coordination in EVAW. Thanks to Sweden support for coordination and communication from 2019, we have seen significant advancements in coordination and knowledge sharing in 2020 despite the pressure of COVID-19 crisis.
Recommendations are all very recognizable, certainly many of them are structural or linked to context in a country which is beyond the influence of UN Women, many have been addressed to a greater or lesser extent, note-ably in recent years, yet the country office (CO) needs to do significantly better, for this reason all recommendations are either accepted or partially accepted. In some areas the huge strides taken by the office simply do not come through, yet the evaluation still identifies these as areas for more increased focus.
For example, the CO has a clear, well-structured approach to coordination and partnerships that is implemented systematically in practice using UN Women's convening powers to bring different actors together. Arguably the CO has been very successful in this area, for example GE is one of the few areas where international community coordination meetings have been regular held since 2015 and one of a few where government co-chairs. Whilst a step increase in financing and effort in this area could have a lot more impact, relative to other mainstreaming or coordination efforts in the country UN Women has been very effective. The evaluation does not underscore the exceptional effort that is required to coordinate in the exceptional environment that is Bosnia and Herzegovina.
However, the evaluation brings valuable light on a range of key issues, either areas where the office has struggled to affect change or areas where further improvement is needed. The thorough Evaluation Reference Group process was clearly appreciated by involved partners ERG members expressed their appreciation of the approach taken by the UN Women, ET and country office
During a review of the draft Management Response by the Country Office with the CPE Evaluation Reference Group members made the following comments. The representative from Sweden stressed her appreciation of the open approach and learning perspective. Emphasizing the value of a clear Theory of Change and explicit referencing of UN Women contribution to improving the overall situation of women and girls in the country. Director of the Agency For Gender Equality, AGE underscored that a joint approach to coordination is highly valued and that UN Women and gender institutional mechanisms should join forces in support to continuity, generational transformation and momentum of the women’s movement in the country. The Programme Coordinator representing UNDP noted “The composite mandate places UN Women with unique comparative advantage to support SDG localization … as well as the process of EU integration in the country”.
The timing of the CPE is ideal, we truly appreciate the sense of urgency to complete the CPE so recommendations could be considered properly within the Strategic Note, appropriate actions are identified for follow up, with a focus on implementation in 2021, the first year of the Strategic Note (2021 to 2025).
|