One of the lessons learnt from this evaluation is that three months period is not sufficient for a remote evaluation, particularly given the complexity of the programme with implementation in 9 countries and a regional approach. Evaluations staring just before Christmas period in the Pacific have proved to be having limited to no response rate until the end of January – another lesson learnt for timing of evaluations. These two have been probably the biggest challenges for the evaluators that came up in every meeting we had. Most of the recommendations have been either accepted or “partially accepted” – the later partially due to the limited time to unpack those during the debriefings. An example is the M&E related observations, for which relevant feedback is given in the Management Response to the Evaluation. Overall the interaction with the evaluators was “very good”.
*Comments