Search
Login
Unwomen
Global Accountability and Tracking of Evaluation Use -
GATE System
Management Response
Home
Plan Details (2012 - 2013)
Management Response
Toggle navigation
Evaluations by Regions
Americas and the Caribbean
Regional Office for Americas and the Caribbean (Panama)
(RO)
Multi-Country Office for the Caribbean (Barbados)
(MCO)
Bolivia
(CO)
Brazil
(CO)
Colombia
(CO)
Dominican Republic
(CO)
Ecuador
(CO)
Guatemala
(CO)
Haiti
(CO)
Mexico
(CO)
Paraguay
(CO)
El Salvador
(CO)
Aruba
(PP)
Antigua and Barbuda
(PP)
Anguilla
(PP)
Argentina
(PP)
Bermuda
(PP)
Bonaire
(PP)
Bahamas
(PP)
Belize
(PP)
Barbados
(PP)
British Virgin Islands
(PP)
Chile
(PP)
Curacao
(PP)
Cayman Islands
(PP)
Dominica
(PP)
Grenada
(PP)
Guyana
(PP)
Honduras
(PP)
Jamaica
(PP)
Montserrat
(PP)
Nicaragua
(PP)
Peru
(PP)
St. Kitts-Nevis
(PP)
St. Lucia
(PP)
Suriname
(PP)
St. Vincent & the Grenadines
(PP)
St. Maarten
(PP)
Turks & Caicos Islands
(PP)
Trinidad & Tobago
(PP)
Uruguay
(PP)
Arab States
Regional Office for Arab States (Egypt)
(RO)
Multi-Country Office for the Maghreb (Morocco)
(MCO)
Egypt
(CO)
Iraq
(CO)
Jordan
(CO)
Palestine
(CO)
Algeria
(PP)
Lebanon
(PP)
Libya
(PP)
Tunisia
(PP)
Yemen
(PP)
Asia and the Pacific
Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand)
(RO)
Multi-Country Office for the Pacific (Fiji)
(MCO)
Multi-Country Office for India, Bhutan, Maldives, and Sri Lanka
(MCO)
Afghanistan
(CO)
Bangladesh
(CO)
Cambodia
(CO)
Nepal
(CO)
Pakistan
(CO)
Papua New Guinea
(CO)
Thailand
(CO)
Timor Leste
(CO)
Vietnam
(CO)
Myanmar
(PP)
China
(PP)
Indonesia
(PP)
Kiribati
(PP)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
(PP)
Philippines
(PP)
Solomon Islands
(PP)
Vanuatu
(PP)
Samoa
(PP)
IST
(HQ)
East and Southern Africa
Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (Kenya)
(RO)
Multi Country Office for Southern Africa (South Africa)
(MCO)
Burundi
(CO)
Ethiopia
(CO)
Kenya
(CO)
Mozambique
(CO)
Malawi
(CO)
Rwanda
(CO)
Somalia
(CO)
South Sudan
(CO)
Sudan
(CO)
Tanzania
(CO)
Uganda
(CO)
Zimbabwe
(CO)
African Union Liaison Office - Ethiopia
(CO)
Europe and Central Asia
Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia (Turkey)
(RO)
Albania
(CO)
Bosnia Herzegovina
(CO)
Georgia
(CO)
Kazakhstan
(CO)
Kyrgyzstan
(CO)
Moldova
(CO)
Turkey
(CO)
Ukraine
(CO)
Kosovo
(PP)
Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of
(PP)
Tajikistan
(PP)
Turkmenistan
(PP)
Uzbekistan
(PP)
Serbia
(PP)
West and Central Africa
Regional Office for West and Central Africa (Senegal)
(RO)
Cote d'Ivoire
(CO)
Cameroon
(CO)
Democratic Republic of Congo
(CO)
Liberia
(CO)
Mali
(CO)
Central African Republic
(CO)
Nigeria
(CO)
Sierra Leone
(CO)
Mauritania
(PP)
Niger
(PP)
Senegal
(PP)
Evaluations by HQs
Executive Director's Office
Executive Director's Office
Independent Evaluation Service (IES)
UNIFEM DATA 2008-2011
Normative Support, United Nations System Coordination and Programme Results
UNTF to EVAW
Civil Society Division
Fund for Gender Equality
Policy, Programme and Intergovernmental Division
UN System Coordination Division
Resource Management, Sustainability, and Partnerships
Strategic Partnerships Division
Human Resources Division
Management and Administration Division
Strategy, Planning, Resources and Effectiveness Division
Best Evaluation Reports
Evaluation By Recommendation
(New)
Evaluations by Type
Cluster Evaluation
Country-level Evaluation
Normative Support Evaluation
Organizational Performance Evaluation
Programme Evaluation
Regional Evaluation
Strategy/Policy Evaluation
Thematic Evaluation
Independent Evaluation Office
Independent Evaluation Office website
UN Women Evaluation Policy
Code of Conduct Form for Evaluation Consultants
UN Women Global Evaluation Strategy (2018-2021)
UN Women Regional Evaluation Strategies
Americans and the Caribbean
Arab States
Asia and the Pacific
East and Southern Africa
Europe and Central Asia
West and Central Africa
United Nations Norms and Standards
UNEG Norms
UNEG Standard
UNEG Code of Conduct for Evaluation in the UN System
Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation
Resources
Gender Equality Evaluation Portal
Guidance and Manuals
UN Women Evaluation Handbook: How to manage gender-responsive evaluation
GERASS Guidance Note
Management Response
Commissioning Unit
:
Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand)
Evaluation Plan
:
2012 - 2013 , Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand) (RO)
Evaluation Title
:
Mid-term Evaluation of the China Gender Facility for Research and Advocacy (CGF)
Evaluation Type
:
Mid Term Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Unit Responsible for Providing Management Response
:
Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand)
Overall Management Response
:
<>
<>
Management Response Status
:
Approved
Recommendations
Recommendation : 1
Recommendation:
Keep what has proven to work. In the case of the CGF, this means keeping it simple by leaving the well alone. Size: Keep it small to keep its catalytic nature ($30-50K with a few possible larger projects of $80K when applicants can demonstrate institutional commitments and stronger impact) Contents: TAC and CGF management team to keep nose to the ground for current and emerging key issues to identify priority themes, and support topics that would gain traction in the mainstream/government policy direction and exploratory ones, especially those that receive little attention elsewhere. Geographic Spread: Maintain good balance across nation; though may support specific cases that warrant good research and advocacy to fill important information gaps. Structure: Maintain the innovative TAC model that has proven to work well with excellent coordination and trusting relationship between the TAC and the CGF Management Team. Process: Keep the collaborative decision making process that is key to management effectiveness for the CGF, which puts common goals and shared interest in the CGF above and beyond those of individual agencies. Communication & Information Dissemination: Continue to maintain close contacts between the UN Women China office and CGF grantees, which are essential to the quality of CGF?s capacity building results, as well as strong transparency and accountability. Intensify advocacy to promote and expand CGF?s impact as well as acquire more sustained funding. This requires repackaging of existing data and orienting their presentation for different sets of audience, putting a human face to the success stories, and reach out to potential new supporters.
Management Response:
All suggestions in this part are about CGF Call for Proposals. In the CGF 6th Call for Prospoals that was annouced from 1 June to 15 July, UN Women and TAC members have started to follow.
More detail
Description:
Management Response Category:
Thematic Area:
Governance and planning (SPs before 2018)
Operating Principles:
Capacity development, Advocacy
Organizational Priorities:
UN Coordination, Not applicable, Partnership, Operational activities
UNEG Criteria:
Effectiveness, Efficiency, Relevance, Gender equality, Sustainability, Impact
Key Actions
Responsible
Deadline
Status
Comments
1.1 In the 6th batch projects, grants vary from $40,000 to $50,000
UN Women
2010/01
Completed
1.1 In the 6th batch projects, grants vary from $40,000 to $50,000
UN Women
2012/08
Completed
1.2 a. Gender and Climate Change, Environment, Disaster Risk Reduction; b. Gender and the Media; c. Gender and Community-Based Poverty Alleviation; d. Gender and Corporate Social Responsibility;
UN Women and TAC
2012/08
Completed
1.3 The 6th batch projects will cover: Heilongjiang, Zhejiang, Yunan, Guizhou, Fujian and Beijing etc
UN Women and TAC
2012/08
Completed
1.4 TAC meeting was organized to decide the themes for 6th Call for Proposals and Proposal Selection.
UN Women and TAC
2012/08
Completed
1.5 CGF info sheet to be produced.
UN Women
2013/05
Completed
Recommendation : 2
Recommendation:
Build a strong business case. Draw on accumulated knowledge to (a) encourage buy-in from key policy and decision makers to make use of the knowledge, lessons, and skills that have been built to be incorporated into policies and practices; and (b) attract sustained investments and funding support with convincing persuasions.
Management Response:
CGF has produced some good results, which should be documented and well presented to government by different chanels so that government can incorporate the good practices into their policy making. UNTGG shall organize high level dialogue with government so that CGF good practices can be presented.
More detail
Description:
Management Response Category:
Thematic Area:
Global norms and standards (SPs before 2018), Governance and planning (SPs before 2018)
Operating Principles:
Knowledge management
Organizational Priorities:
UN Coordination, Normative Support
UNEG Criteria:
Effectiveness, Gender equality
Key Actions
Responsible
Deadline
Status
Comments
2.1 To document CGF good practices and formulate them into a well presented format
UN Women
2013/03
Completed
2.2 Present CGF good practices to government.
UNTGG
2013/03
Completed
Recommendation : 3
Recommendation:
The TAC and UNTGG should consider undertaking a joint resource mobilization exercise with government, grantees, etc., possibly beyond China. Resource mobilization efforts may also tap into the encouraging development of Corporate Social Responsibility policies and the rapidly growing number of charitable private foundations with in China. Social media, a communication vehicle that has enjoyed phenomenal success globally and especially in China, should also be used for promoting the CGF, sharing its knowledge and lessons learnt, and mobilizing the collective resources of the global community striving towards gender equality.
Management Response:
Resources Mobilization is always a challenge to CGF. According to the TAC?s decision, every donor needs to make a contribution of at least $5000 USD to the CGF every two years to maintain its membership, a change from the previous rule that a contribution of any amount would maintain TAC membership for four years. UNICEF, UNDP, WHO, UNESCO, and UNAIDS will lose their TAC membership in 2013 if they do not make any new contributions.
More detail
Description:
Management Response Category:
Thematic Area:
Governance and planning (SPs before 2018)
Operating Principles:
Knowledge management
Organizational Priorities:
UN Coordination, Not applicable, Partnership, Operational activities
UNEG Criteria:
Effectiveness, Relevance, Efficiency, Impact, Sustainability
Key Actions
Responsible
Deadline
Status
Comments
3.1 Donor Mapping
UN Women
2013/03
Completed
3.2 Joint Resource Mobilization
TAC
2013/03
Completed
×
Approve Management Response
Are you sure, you want to Approve this Management Response?
×
Decline Management Response
Are you sure, you want to Decline this Management Response?
*Comments
Please enter comment.
×
Submit Management Response
Are you sure, you want to submit the management response ?
×
Add Key Action
×
Add New Recommendation
×
Delete Recommendation ?
Are you sure, you want to delete this Recommendation? You can't undo this action.
×
Delete Key Action ?
Are you sure, you want to delete this Key Action? You can't undo this action.