Evaluation : Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Thailand) (RO)

Active Evaluation Plan(s): 2024 - 2024 View
Archived Evaluation Plan(s):

2023 - 2023 View

2022 - 2022 View

2020 - 2021 View

2019 - 2019 View

2018 - 2018 View

2017 - 2017 View

2016 - 2016 View

2015 - 2015 View

2014 - 2014 View

2012 - 2013 View

2010 - 2011 View

2008 - 2009 View

Evaluation Reports

SNo Evaluation Evaluation Type Completion Date Quality Rating Management Response
1 Final evaluation – Regional Project “Preventing exploitation of women migrant workers”
Final Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Good Yes
2 Regional meta-evaluation
Meta-Evaluation-Organizational Performance Evaluation
Not Rated Yes
3 Endline Evaluation Report Leveraging Technical Tools, Evidence and Community Engagement to Advance the Implementation of Laws and Provision of Services to Women Experiencing Violence in South-East Asia
Final Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Good Yes
4 Final Evaluation of Regional Programme on Improving Women’s Human Rights in South East Asia – CEDAW SEAP
Final Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Good Yes
5 Final evaluation of SDC funded part of Regional Programme on Empowering Women Migrant Workers in Asia (Phase III EWMWA 2012-2015)
Final Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Good Yes
6 Mid-term Review of Regional Programme on Improving Women?s Human Rights in South East Asia ? CEDAW SEAP
Mid Term Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Satisfactory Yes
7 Final Evaluation of the Project on the Project on Regional Mechanisms to Protect the Human Rights of Women and Girls in South East Asia
Final Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Satisfactory Yes
8 Mid-term Evaluation of the China Gender Facility for Research and Advocacy (CGF)
Mid Term Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Not Rated Yes
9 Programme Evaluation of SAARC Gender Info Base of SAARC-UN Women, South Asia Regional Office
Final Evaluation-Thematic Evaluation
Not Rated Yes
10 Mid-Term Evaluation of the Integrated Programme for Women in Politics and Decision-Making (IPWPDM)
Mid Term Evaluation-Programme Evaluation
Not Rated Yes